Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Comparative study reveals differences in mood and anxiety in insomnia patients and trial volunteers, suggesting better trial inclusion criteria.
The generalizability of outcome data derived from insomnia clinical trials is based largely on the extent to which research volunteers resemble clinical patients. This study compared sociodemographic, sleep, psychological, and medical characteristics of individuals who volunteered for an insomnia treatment study (n = 120) to patients who sought treatment in a clinical setting (n = 106). The samples did not differ on most sleep and medical variables, but clinical patients had a higher prevalence of mood disorders, greater anxiety and depression symptoms, and higher perceived insomnia severity. Differences on psychological variables were accentuated by the research selection process. It is suggested to minimize exclusion based on psychological comorbidity in order to enhance ecological validity of randomized controlled trials of insomnia treatments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davidson et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: