Key result
Performing the incremental shuttle walking test in a hallway elicited a higher peak oxygen uptake (25.4 vs 23.7 ml/kg/min, p=0.05) compared to performing it on a treadmill in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Why the study?
Knowledge about the cardiopulmonary response between hallway incremental shuttle walking test and incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill, as well as factors associated with distance achieved in Phase IV cardiac rehabilitation, is limited.
Does performing an incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill (ISWT-T) produce similar cardiopulmonary responses compared to performing it in a hallway (ISWT) in phase IV cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=13)
Counterbalanced
No
Does performing an incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill (ISWT-T) produce similar cardiopulmonary responses compared to performing it in a hallway (ISWT) in phase IV cardiac rehabilitation patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 25.4% vs 23.7%
p-value: p=0.05
Performing the incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill yields similar cardiopulmonary responses to hallway testing in cardiac rehabilitation patients, though hallway testing evokes a slightly higher peak oxygen uptake.
Treadmill ISWT may modestly underestimate peak VO2 in cardiac rehab; leaves open standardized protocols for functional assessment.
There is a widespread use of incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) to measure functional capacity in cardiac rehabilitation patients. Due to occasional physical space limitations, an incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill (ISWT-T) was suggested as an alternative. Knowledge about the cardiopulmonary response between the two tests and the factors associated with the distance achieved in Phase IV cardiac rehabilitation is limited. Thus, the study aims to compare the cardiopulmonary response between ISWT and ISWT-T and investigate the factors associated with distance achieved in both tests. Methods Thirteen participants (66.3 ± 7.3 years, 84.6% males) attending phase IV cardiac rehabilitation participated in repeated measures counterbalanced trials. Each participant performed one ISWT and one ISWT-T separated by seven days. Main outcome measures included peak heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure post-test, distance achieved, respiratory frequency, tidal volume (VT), minute ventilation, respiratory exchange ratio, peak oxygen uptake (VO 2PEAK ), and secondary outcome measures included height, weight, waist circumference (WC) leg length (LL). Results There were no significant differences in the cardiopulmonary responses between ISWT and ISWT-T except for VO 2PEAK (25.4 ± 5.8 vs 23.7 ± 5.1, p=0.05, respectively). Age and height were significantly correlated with distance achieved during ISWT, and ISWT-T [age ( r =-0.72, vs. r =-0.73, p ≤0.05, respectively)], [height ( r =0.68, vs. r =0.68, p ≤ 0.05, respectively)]. LL was only correlated with distance achieved on ISWT-T ( r =0.59, p ≤ 0.05). Conclusion These findings suggest a similar cardiopulmonary response between the two tests, but doing ISWT in the hallway evoked a higher metabolic demand than doing it on a treadmill. Additionally, distance achieved on both tests was related to height and inversely to age.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad Osailan (2022) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (Phase IV cardiac rehabilitation) (n=13). Incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT) in a hallway vs. Incremental shuttle walking test on a treadmill (ISWT-T) was evaluated on Peak oxygen uptake (VO2PEAK) (p=0.05). Performing the incremental shuttle walking test in a hallway elicited a higher peak oxygen uptake (25.4 vs 23.7 ml/kg/min, p=0.05) compared to performing it on a treadmill in cardiac rehabilitation patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: