Key result
Family size >8 (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.92) and income <5000 SR were negatively associated with obesity, while having a working mother (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.03-1.99) was positively associated.
Why the study?
Do socioeconomic factors and lifestyle habits influence the prevalence of obesity among adolescent male students in Saudi Arabia?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,495)
Yes
Do socioeconomic factors and lifestyle habits influence the prevalence of obesity among adolescent male students in Saudi Arabia?
Odds Ratio: 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.92)
p-value: p=0.05
In Saudi Arabian adolescent males, larger family size and lower income were associated with lower obesity risk, whereas having an educated and working mother was associated with higher obesity risk.
Socioeconomic associations with obesity in Saudi adolescent males are hypothesis-generating; prospective studies needed before any practice implications.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the effect of some socioeconomic factors and lifestyle habits on the prevalence of obesity among adolescent male students in the Hail region, Saudi Arabia. A questionnaire was filled by 1495 male adolescents distributed among 12 schools in the Hail region. Body weight and height were taken, and the Z-score of students was measured using Anthroplus software with a cutoff 1–2 and +2 standard deviations to determine overweight and obesity, respectively. The study revealed that 21.3% of students were overweight and 27% were obese, respectively. There was a negative association between family size of >8 and obesity (OR: 0.68, CI: 0.48–0.92, p = 0.05). Family income of <5000 SR was negatively associated with obesity (OR: 0.59, CI: 0.36–0.97, p = 0.03). Whether a subject’s mother worked (odds ratio (OR): 1.43, confidence interval CI: 1.03–1.99, p = 0.03) as well as the subject’s mother’s education—whether she can read and write, has a middle school degree, or has done postsecondary studies—were positively associated with obesity. Exercise, regardless of the duration, was negatively associated with obesity. In addition, sleeping <6 h/day had a positive association with obesity. Conclusion: a >8 family size and a low family income were negatively associated with obesity, while having an educated and working mother was positively associated with obesity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alazzeh et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Obesity (n=1,495). Family size >8 vs. Family size ≤8 was evaluated on Obesity (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.92, p=0.05). Family size >8 (OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.48-0.92) and income <5000 SR were negatively associated with obesity, while having a working mother (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.03-1.99) was positively associated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: