Key result
Aortic valve replacement linked to an ~18-point improvement in quality of life at 3 months.
Why the study?
No quality of life tool was specifically developed for patients with severe aortic stenosis to evaluate how the disease and its treatment affect patients.
Is the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) a valid and reliable tool to measure quality of life changes in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement?
Observational (n=274)
Yes
Is the Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) a valid and reliable tool to measure quality of life changes in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement?
The TASQ is a validated, disease-specific instrument for measuring quality of life in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing valve replacement.
AVR-associated QoL gains support TASQ responsiveness; extends validation but leaves open randomized confirmation before wider use.
AIMS: There is no quality of life tool specifically developed for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) to assess how this chronic condition and its treatment affect patients. The Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) has been developed to overcome this gap. The results of the validation of the TASQ in patients undergoing treatment for severe AS are presented. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective study at 10 centres in Europe and Canada, which enrolled 274 patients with severe symptomatic AS undergoing surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Mean TASQ score at baseline was 71.2 points and increased to 88.9 three months after aortic valve implantation (P < 0.001). Increases were seen for the emotional impact (32.0 to 39.0; P < 0.001), physical limitations (14.8 to 22.0; P < 0.001), and physical symptoms (8.5 vs. 11.0; P < 0.001) domains. Internal consistency was good/excellent for overall TASQ score (α = 0.891) and for the physical limitation, emotional impact, and social limitation domains (α = 0.815-0.950). Test-retest reliability was excellent or strong for the overall TASQ (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.883) and for the physical symptoms, physical limitation, emotional impact, and social limitation domains (intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.791-0.895). Responsiveness was medium overall (Cohen's d = 0.637) and medium/large for physical symptoms, emotional impact, and physical limitations (0.661-0.812). Sensitivity to change was significant for physical symptoms, physical limitations (both P < 0.001), emotional impact (P = 0.003), and social limitations (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: The TASQ is a new, brief, self-administered, and clinically relevant health-specific tool to measure changes in quality of life in patients with AS undergoing an intervention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Frank et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (n=274). Aortic valve replacement (SAVR or TAVI) vs. Baseline (pre-intervention) was evaluated on Change in mean Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (TASQ) total score from baseline to 3 months (Mean difference 17.7 points, p=<0.001). Aortic valve replacement significantly improved patient quality of life, increasing the mean Toronto Aortic Stenosis Quality of Life Questionnaire score from 71.2 at baseline to 88.9 at 3 months.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: