Key result
Psychological distress and worse health link to lower satisfaction with cardiology telehealth care.
Why the study?
Telemedicine rapidly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, but little was known regarding patient characteristics associated with the acceptability of telehealth care over time.
Cohort (n=317)
No
Patient-specific demographic and psychological profiles significantly influence satisfaction with and attitudes toward telehealth, emphasizing that a tailored approach is needed when implementing remote cardiac care.
Psychological profiles were associated with lower telehealth satisfaction in cardiac patients; leaves open whether screening enables tailored remote care.
BackgroundDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was advocated and rapidly scaled up worldwide. However, little is known about for whom this type of care is acceptable.ObjectiveTo examine which patient characteristics (demographic, medical, psychosocial) are associated with telehealth care satisfaction, attitude toward telehealth, and preference regarding telehealth over time in a cardiac patient population.MethodsIn total, 317 patients were recruited at the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital in The Netherlands. All patients who had received telehealth care (telephone and video) in the previous 2 months were approached for participation. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month questionnaires were administered online. A 3-step latent class analysis was conducted to identify trajectories of telehealth use over time and the possible association of the found trajectories with external variables.ResultsFive trajectories (classes) were identified for satisfaction with telehealth and 4 for attitude toward telehealth. Patients with higher distress, lower physical and mental health, higher scores on pessimism, and negative affectivity were more likely to be less satisfied. Patients with no partner, more comorbidities, higher distress, lower physical and mental health, and higher scores on pessimism were more likely to hold a negative attitude toward telehealth. For the future application of telehealth, marital status, comorbidities, digital health literacy, and pessimism were significantly related.ConclusionResults show that patients’ profiles should be considered when offering telehealth care and that the “one size fits all” approach does not apply. Results can inform clinical practice on how to better implement remote health care in the future while considering a personalized approach. During the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was advocated and rapidly scaled up worldwide. However, little is known about for whom this type of care is acceptable. To examine which patient characteristics (demographic, medical, psychosocial) are associated with telehealth care satisfaction, attitude toward telehealth, and preference regarding telehealth over time in a cardiac patient population. In total, 317 patients were recruited at the Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital in The Netherlands. All patients who had received telehealth care (telephone and video) in the previous 2 months were approached for participation. Baseline, 3-month, and 6-month questionnaires were administered online. A 3-step latent class analysis was conducted to identify trajectories of telehealth use over time and the possible association of the found trajectories with external variables. Five trajectories (classes) were identified for satisfaction with telehealth and 4 for attitude toward telehealth. Patients with higher distress, lower physical and mental health, higher scores on pessimism, and negative affectivity were more likely to be less satisfied. Patients with no partner, more comorbidities, higher distress, lower physical and mental health, and higher scores on pessimism were more likely to hold a negative attitude toward telehealth. For the future application of telehealth, marital status, comorbidities, digital health literacy, and pessimism were significantly related. Results show that patients’ profiles should be considered when offering telehealth care and that the “one size fits all” approach does not apply. Results can inform clinical practice on how to better implement remote health care in the future while considering a personalized approach.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schalkwijk et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Cardiac conditions (coronary heart disease, heart failure, arrhythmias) (n=317). Telehealth care (telephone and video) was evaluated on Trajectories of telehealth care satisfaction, attitude toward telehealth, and preference regarding application over time. Patients with higher distress, lower physical and mental health, and pessimism were less satisfied with telehealth, while marital status, digital literacy, and optimism favored future telehealth application.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: