Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Musculoskeletal injuries are among the most common causes of physical disability in athletes, often requiring long-term rehabilitation. Advances in digital health technologies have allowed the uptake of telerehabilitation (TR) over in-person therapy. However, TR's effects in sports-related musculoskeletal injuries have been reported variably at a clinical level. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to explore the effectiveness of telerehabilitation compared to traditional rehabilitation in improving functional outcomes, pain relief, and satisfaction among patients with musculoskeletal injuries. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed and related databases revealed 25 peer-reviewed studies published during the period of 2017 to 2025. Eligible studies comprised randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses evaluating TR interventions in sport-associated musculoskeletal disorders. Outcomes of interest included pain severity, functional recovery, patient compliance, and patient satisfaction. Results: Most of the studies found that TR led to at least as much or better effects than traditional rehabilitation on pain and functioning outcomes. Meta-analytic search suggested that TR did not differ significantly from face-to-face interventions in the incidence of adverse events. Program duration, adherence rates, and technological access were, however, highlighted as key moderators of efficacy. Conclusions: Telerehabilitation is a safe and effective solution to common musculoskeletal sports injury rehabilitation. Utilization of such a strategy will be limited by adherence to prescribed protocols, patient education, and usage of digital health in order to enhance clinical outcomes and engagement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Golis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: