Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Single-switch step-up/step-down converters, such as the buck-boost, SEPIC and Cuk, have relatively high voltage and current stresses on components compared to the buck or the boost converter. A buck-boost converter with two independently controlled switches can work as a boost or as a buck converter depending on input-output conditions, and thus achieves lower stresses on components. Using the converter synthesis method from D. Zhou (1995), families of two-switch buck-boost converters are generated, including several new converter topologies. The two-switch buck-boost converters are evaluated and compared in terms of component stresses in universal-input power-factor-corrector applications. Among them, one new two-switch converter is identified that has low inductor conduction losses (50% of the boost converter), low inductor volt-seconds (72% of the boost converter), and about the same switch conduction losses and voltage stresses as the boost converter.
Chen et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: