Key result
Multimodality imaging remains essential for patient selection and procedural planning in TAVR.
A comprehensive multimodality imaging approach is essential for accurate patient selection and procedural planning in transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Supports multimodality imaging for TAVR planning; extends prior syntheses but leaves open need for prospective validation.
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been validated as a new therapy for patients affected by severe symptomatic aortic stenosis who are not eligible for surgical intervention because of major contraindication or high operative risk. Patient selection for TAVR should be based not only on accurate assessment of aortic stenosis morphology, but also on several clinical and functional data. Multi-Imaging modalities should be preferred for assessing the anatomy and the dimensions of the aortic valve and annulus before TAVR. Ultrasounds represent the first line tool in evaluation of this patients giving detailed anatomic description of aortic valve complex and allowing estimating with enough reliability the hemodynamic entity of valvular stenosis. Angiography should be used to assess coronary involvement and plan a revascularization strategy before the implant. Multislice computed tomography play a central role as it can give anatomical details in order to choice the best fitting prosthesis, evaluate the morphology of the access path and detect other relevant comorbidities. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography are emergent modality helpful in aortic stenosis evaluation. The aim of this review is to give an overview on TAVR clinical and technical aspects essential for adequate selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cocchia et al. (2017) conducted a review in Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. Multimodality imaging was evaluated. Multimodality imaging is essential for adequate patient selection and procedural planning for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: