Key result
A paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme significantly improved exercise capacity (p=0.00009), though parents and patients had divergent perceptions regarding improvements in quality of life.
Why the study?
There has been limited research into how including psychological interventions in paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programmes impacts parent-reported and patient-reported quality of life.
Does a paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme including psychological interventions improve quality of life and exercise capacity in patients aged 7 to 24 years with congenital heart disease?
Cohort
Does a paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme including psychological interventions improve quality of life and exercise capacity in patients aged 7 to 24 years with congenital heart disease?
p-value: p=0.00009
A multidisciplinary paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme improves exercise capacity and parent-reported quality of life, though patient and parent perceptions of improvement diverge.
May support exercise capacity gains in congenital heart disease; hypothesis-generating for quality-of-life effects and needs randomized trials.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac rehabilitation programmes for paediatric patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) have been shown to promote emotional and physical health without any associated adverse events. While prior studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of these types of interventions, there has been limited research into how the inclusion of psychological interventions as part of the programme impacts parent-reported and patient-reported quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients between the ages of 7 and 24 years with CHD completed a cardiac rehabilitation programme that followed a flexible structure of four in person-visits with various multidisciplinary team members, including paediatric psychologists. Changes in scores from the earliest to the latest session were assessed regarding exercise capacity, patient functioning (social, emotional, school, psychosocial), patient general and cardiac-related quality of life, patient self-concept, and patient behavioural/emotional problems. RESULTS: From their baseline to final session, patients exhibited significant improvement in exercise capacity (p = 0.00009). Parents reported improvement in the patient's emotional functioning, social functioning, school functioning, psychosocial functioning, cognitive functioning, communication, and overall quality of life. While patients did not report improvement in these above areas, they did report perceived improvement in certain aspects of cardiac-related quality of life and self-concept. DISCUSSION: This paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme, which included regular consultations with paediatric psychologists, was associated with divergent perceptions by parents and patients on improvement related to quality of life and other aspects of functioning despite improvement in exercise capacity. Further investigation is recommended to identify underlying factors associated with the differing perceptions of parents and patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kroll et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Congenital heart disease (CHD). Cardiac rehabilitation programme with psychological interventions was evaluated on Exercise capacity (p=0.00009). A paediatric cardiac rehabilitation programme significantly improved exercise capacity (p=0.00009), though parents and patients had divergent perceptions regarding improvements in quality of life.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: