Key result
Despite evidence that MRI can be safely performed in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, significant logistical, educational, and financial barriers result in severe under-provision of this necessary service.
Why the study?
Despite evidence that MRI can be safely performed in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, provision remains grossly inadequate worldwide due to non-technical barriers.
Despite established safety protocols and guidelines, patients with CIEDs face significant non-technical barriers to accessing MRI, resulting in a massive under-provision of necessary scans.
Persistent barriers cause severe MRI under-provision in CIED patients; leaves open targeted solutions for equitable access.
More than half of us will need a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in our lifetimes. MRI is an unmatched diagnostic test for an expanding range of indications including neurological and musculoskeletal disorders, cancer diagnosis, and treatment planning. Unfortunately, patients with cardiac pacemakers or defibrillators have historically been prevented from having MRI because of safety concerns. This results in delayed diagnoses, more invasive investigations, and increased cost. Major developments have addressed this-newer devices are designed to be safe in MRI machines under specific conditions, and older legacy devices can be scanned provided strict protocols are followed. This service however remains difficult to deliver sustainably worldwide: MRI provision remains grossly inadequate because patients are less likely to be referred, and face difficulties accessing services even when referred. Barriers still exist but are no longer technical. These include logistical hurdles (poor cardiology and radiology interaction at physician and technician levels), financial incentives (re-imbursement is either absent or fails to acknowledge the complexity), and education (physicians self-censor MRI requests). This article therefore highlights the recent changes in the clinical, logistical, and regulatory landscape. The aim of the article is to enable and encourage healthcare providers and local champions to build MRI services urgently for cardiac device patients, so that they may benefit from the same access to MRI as everyone else. KEY POINTS: • There is now considerable evidence that MRI can be provided safely to patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). However, the volume of MRI scans delivered to patients with CIEDs is fifty times lower than that of the estimated need, and patients are approximately fifty times less likely to be referred. • Because scans for this patient group are frequently for cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, MRI services need to develop rapidly, but the barriers are no longer technical. • New services face logistical, educational, and financial hurdles which can be addressed effectively to establish a sustainable service at scale.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhuva et al. (2019) conducted a review in Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was evaluated. Despite evidence that MRI can be safely performed in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, significant logistical, educational, and financial barriers result in severe under-provision of this necessary service.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: