Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial investigates Morphine ARER's pharmacokinetics in opioid users, indicating lower abuse potential.
Objective . To investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of Morphine ARER, an extended-release (ER), abuse-deterrent formulation of morphine sulfate after oral and intranasal administration. Methods . This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, four-way crossover study assessed the PK of morphine and its active metabolite, M6G, from crushed intranasal Morphine ARER and intact oral Morphine ARER compared with crushed intranasal ER morphine following administration to nondependent, recreational opioid users. The correlation between morphine PK and the pharmacodynamic parameter of drug liking, a measure of abuse potential, was also evaluated. Results . Mean maximum observed plasma concentration ( C max ) for morphine was lower with crushed intranasal Morphine ARER (26.2 ng/mL) and intact oral Morphine ARER (18.6 ng/mL), compared with crushed intranasal ER morphine (49.5 ng/mL). The time to C max ( T max ) was the same for intact oral and crushed intranasal Morphine ARER (1.6 hours) and longer for crushed intranasal morphine ER (1.1 hours). Higher mean maximum morphine C max , T max , and abuse quotient ( C max / T max ) were positively correlated with maximum effect for drug liking ( R 2 ≥ 0.9795). Conclusion . These data suggest that Morphine ARER maintains its ER profile despite physical manipulation and intranasal administration, which may be predictive of a lower intranasal abuse potential compared with ER morphine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Webster et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: