Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Literature review discusses chronic benign pain prevalence in adults, indicating variability in reporting methods.
In this review epidemiological studies concerning chronic benign pain among adults are discussed. To this end, studies focusing on chronic pain, reporting prevalences at a population or primary health care level, including subjects aged between 18 and 75 years have been collected and analyzed. Focus of analysis was on research methods, definitions of chronic benign pain used, and reported prevalences. Prevalences varied between 2% and 40% of the population. Nor method used (telephone survey, postal survey, nor definition of chronicity (>1 month; >3 months; >6 months) clearly explained the differences in prevalence in the various studies. Implications for future research are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verhaak et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: