first method of coronary revascularization (CR), became possible in the 1960s due to advanced achievements in clinical medicine (2) .PCI, as an alternative method, emerged in 1978 (3) and quickly gained a dominant position because of its low invasiveness, irreplaceability in acute CA disease (CAD), and good reproducibility (4) .Nowadays, treatment of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) is directed toward reducing symptoms,In the present review, we have discussed the fundamental issues of coronary revascularization in stable coronary artery disease and shown the pivotal differences between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting regarding the long-term prognosis and clinical profiles.The analysis of the latest publications has demonstrated the advantages of open heart surgery due to the long-term survival and prevention of adverse events in specific groups of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Попова et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: