A concise synthetic strategy was used for the first preparation of GS analogues with trisubstituted (E)-alkene peptide bond replacements. Solution and solid state conformational analysis demonstrated that the bistrifluoromethylated analogue was a superior mimic of the natural product, whereas the incorporation of methyl groups into the alkene peptide isostere led to a far greater perturbation of the secondary structure features of GS. The difference between CF3- and CH3-substitution can be explained by the superior electrostatic carbonyl group mimicry of the former function.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: