Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Compares sequence-to-sequence user simulation with language model methods, indicating superior performance.
User simulators are a principal offline method for training and evaluating human-computer dialog systems. In this paper, we examine simple sequence-to-sequence neural network architectures for training end-to-end, natural language to natural language, user simulators, using only raw logs of previous interactions without any additional human labelling. We compare the neural network-based simulators with a language model (LM)-based approach for creating natural language user simulators. Using both an automatic evaluation using LM perplexity and a human evaluation, we demonstrate that the sequence-to-sequence approaches outperform the LM-based method. We show correlation between LM perplexity and the human evaluation on this task, and discuss the benefits of different neural network architecture variations. — Example sessions that were generated when running the seq2seq user simulator models with Cortana.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crook et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: