Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Classical psychometrics held that scores on a personality measure were determined by the trait assessed and random measurement error. A new view proposes a much richer and more complex model that includes trait variance at multiple levels of a hierarchy of traits and systematic biases shaped by the implicit personality theory of the respondent. The model has implications for the optimal length and content of scales and for the use of scales intended to correct for evaluative bias; further, it suggests that personality assessments should supplement self-reports with informant ratings. The model also has implications for the very nature of personality traits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McCrae et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: