Key result
Cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced total atrial duration activation in post-myocardial infarction patients from 120.8 msec before rehabilitation to 113.3 msec after rehabilitation (p<0.01).
Why the study?
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve atrial activation parameters and hemodynamics in patients after myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=50)
Does cardiac rehabilitation improve atrial activation parameters and hemodynamics in patients after myocardial infarction?
Absolute Event Rate: 113.3% vs 120.8%
p-value: p=<0.01
Cardiac rehabilitation improves intra-atrial activation duration and hemodynamic parameters in patients early after myocardial infarction.
Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) can improve cardiac hemodynamic performance in patients after myocardial infarction (MI). Little evidence is provided concerning the consequences of CR on atrial wave duration, and less is known about the link between pre-arrhythmogenic patterns and the cardiovascular performance improvement in these subjects. Twenty-six patients, post-MI 0 to 7 days, underwent a complete CR cycle and a signal-averaged electrocardiogram (SAECG) for the evaluation of atrial activation parameters (group 1) to appreciate if physical training can promote parallel improvement in cardiovascular and intra-atrial conduction parameters. A control group of 24 well-matched nonischemic subjects (group 2) was chosen for data comparison. Resting heart rate (p < 0.01) and resting double product (p < 0.01) decreased after CR in groups 1 and 2, while diastolic blood pressure at maximal stress was decreased in group 1 (p < 0.01) with a parallel increase in the time of physical training (p < 0.05). SAECG parameters of atrial activation were unchanged in group 1 after the comparison and only total atrial duration activation (dA) reached statistical significance (113.3 +/- 17.2 msec vs 120.8 +/- 14.2 msec, subjects after CR vs before CR, p < 0.01). CR could improve intra-atrial activation in subjects after MI, but the consequences of hemodynamic adjustment of the trained heart must undergo a more accurate evaluation to verify if CR can prevent adverse arrhythmogenic complications of MI through cardiovascular performance improvement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maio et al. (2001) conducted an observational in Myocardial Infarction (n=50). Cardiac rehabilitation vs. Before cardiac rehabilitation / Nonischemic controls was evaluated on Total atrial duration activation (dA) (p=<0.01). Cardiac rehabilitation significantly reduced total atrial duration activation in post-myocardial infarction patients from 120.8 msec before rehabilitation to 113.3 msec after rehabilitation (p<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: