Key result
A modified fluoroscopy protocol significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (13.8 vs 16.7 minutes, P<0.01) during CB2 PVI with comparable 1-year freedom from AF (73% vs 71%, ns).
Why the study?
Reported radiation exposure during CB2 PVI for AF is higher compared with other technologies, prompting investigation into a modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize exposure regarding safety and efficacy.
Does a modified fluoroscopy protocol reduce radiation exposure and procedure time without compromising efficacy in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with a second-generation cryoballoon?
Cohort (n=180)
Does a modified fluoroscopy protocol reduce radiation exposure and procedure time without compromising efficacy in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with a second-generation cryoballoon?
A modified fluoroscopy protocol during cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation significantly reduces fluoroscopy and procedure times without compromising 1-year freedom from atrial fibrillation.
May reduce radiation exposure in cryoballoon PVI; leaves open confirmation of efficacy in randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) is considered to be safe and effective in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Reported radiation exposure during PVI with CB2 is higher if compared with other technologies. We investigated acute and mid-term effects of a modified fluoroscopy protocol to minimize radiation exposure during CB2 PVI with regard to safety and efficacy. METHODS: The study comprised 180 consecutive patients undergoing CB2 PVI. In the first 100 patients, PVI was performed using conventional fluoroscopy settings (group 1), while the following 80 patients (group 2) received PVI with a modified protocol. The protocol consisted of (a) general reduction of fluoroscopy frame rate to 3/s, (b) avoidance of cine runs and selective PV angiograms, and (c) enhanced radiation awareness. Retrospective data analysis was performed in respect to dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from AF during a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: ), fluoroscopy time (13.8 ± 6.3 vs 16.7 ± 5.6 minutes), LA dwell time (49.3 ± 15.5 vs 61.6 ± 16.2 minutes), and procedure time (85.5 ± 22.9 vs 94.9 ± 23.6 minutes); P < .01 for all. One-year freedom from AF was comparable between both groups (71% group 1 vs 73% group 2, ns). CONCLUSION: Radiation exposure and procedure time during CB2 PVI can be significantly reduced by using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness without compromising acute and 1-year freedom from AF if performed by experienced operators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wieczorek et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation (n=180). Modified fluoroscopy protocol vs. Conventional fluoroscopy settings was evaluated on One-year freedom from atrial fibrillation (p=ns). A modified fluoroscopy protocol significantly reduced fluoroscopy time (13.8 vs 16.7 minutes, P<0.01) during CB2 PVI with comparable 1-year freedom from AF (73% vs 71%, ns).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: