Why the study?
CB PVI involves increased radiation exposure compared with radiofrequency ablation, and the mid-term clinical outcome of reducing radiation through a modified fluoroscopy protocol needed evaluation.
Does a modified fluoroscopy protocol reduce radiation exposure without compromising clinical efficacy in patients undergoing second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Does a modified fluoroscopy protocol reduce radiation exposure without compromising clinical efficacy in patients undergoing second-generation cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation?
Implementing a modified fluoroscopy protocol without cine runs significantly reduces radiation exposure during cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation without compromising procedural success or 1-year clinical outcomes.
Modified fluoroscopy may lower radiation in CB PVI; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
PURPOSE: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoon (CB) ablation is associated with an increased radiation exposure compared with radiofrequency ablation. Previous studies showed that radiation exposure in CB PVI can be reduced by optimizing the fluoroscopy protocol without comprising acute efficacy and safety. We evaluated the mid-term outcome of a modified fluoroscopy protocol in patients undergoing CB PVI. METHODS: The study population comprised 90 consecutive patients who underwent second-generation CB-based PVI. The first 46 patients underwent CB PVI with conventional fluoroscopy settings (group A, historic control group). In the following 44 patients (group B), a modified fluoroscopy protocol was applied consisting of (1) visualization of degree of PV occlusion only by fluoroscopy (no cine runs); (2) increased radiation awareness. Primary endpoints were the total dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time, and freedom from documented recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after a single procedure. RESULTS: , P < 0.001) and median fluoroscopy time (20 min vs. 24 min, P < 0.001) as compared with group A. The 1-year freedom from documented recurrence of AF after a single procedure was similar among groups (74% in group A vs. 77% in group B, P = 0.71). There were no significant differences between both groups for the secondary endpoints, including procedure duration, proportion of patients with complete electrical isolation, and complications. CONCLUSION: Using a modified fluoroscopy protocol and increased radiation awareness, radiation exposure can be significantly reduced in CB PVI with a similar 1-year clinical outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holl et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: