Why the study?
Does intracoronary urokinase improve procedural success and reduce the need for emergency CABG in patients with complicated coronary angioplasty?
Does intracoronary urokinase improve procedural success and reduce the need for emergency CABG in patients with complicated coronary angioplasty?
Intracoronary urokinase significantly improves procedural success and reduces the need for emergency CABG in patients experiencing acute complications during coronary angioplasty.
May support intracoronary urokinase in complicated angioplasty; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was complicated by acute coronary occlusion, dissection of the arterial wall, or angiographic evidence of intraluminal thrombosis in 33 high-risk patients from 153 consecutive angioplasty procedures (21.5%). Ten patients (group I) were managed with nitroglycerin (0.2 to 0.4 mg i.c.) and repeated attempts at mechanical guide wire recanalization or dilation, but they did not receive thrombolytic therapy. In the remaining 23 patients (group II), intracoronary urokinase (100,000 to 360,000 U.I.) was administered over 15-20 min after onset of coronary occlusion or thrombosis and continued during attempts at repeated dilation of the stenosis. The incidence of sudden coronary artery occlusion was 70% in group I patients and 52% in group II. The angiographic evidence of thrombus formation was observed in a higher, but not significant, proportion of group II patients (65%) as compared with group I (30%). The incidence of intimal tearing or dissection was similar in the two groups of patients (40 vs. 34.7%). The overall final success rate of the complicated angioplasty series was 48% (6/33). However, the success rate was lower (10%) in group I than in group II patients (10 vs. 65%; P less than 0.005), and the frequency of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting was lower in group II patients (13 vs. 60%; P = 0.01), suggesting that thrombolytic therapy with urokinase may be effective in the management of acute coronary occlusion and thromboembolic complications of coronary angioplasty.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verna et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: