Why the study?
Does a multiple-breath-hold imaging method with real-time slab following improve resolution, SNR, and coverage compared to a single-breath-hold scan in normal volunteers?
Does a multiple-breath-hold imaging method with real-time slab following improve resolution, SNR, and coverage compared to a single-breath-hold scan in normal volunteers?
A multiple-breath-hold 3D segmented k-space imaging method with real-time slab following improves resolution, coverage, and SNR for coronary artery imaging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
May enhance coronary MRA quality in volunteers; hypothesis-generating for patient studies before clinical adoption.
Shea et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: