PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 1, 2000Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics304 citations

Performance Evaluation of the MiniMed® Continuous Glucose Monitoring System During Patient Home Use

View Full Paper
TGTodd M. GrossBBBruce W. BodeDEDaniel Einhorn

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: The recent availability of a continuous glucose monitor offers the opportunity to match the demands of intensive diabetes management with a period of equally intensive blood glucose monitoring. The present study evaluates the performance of the MiniMed® continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) in patients with diabetes during home use. Methods: Performance data and demographic information were obtained from 135 patients who were (mean ± SD) 40.5 ± 14.5 years old, had an average duration of diabetes of 18.0 ± 9.8 years, 50% were female, 90% were Caucasian, and 87% of whom had been diagnosed with type 1 diabetes. Patients were selected by their physician, trained on the use of the CGMS and wore the device at home for 3 days or more. The performance of the CGMS was evaluated against blood glucose measurements obtained using each patient’s home blood glucose meter. Evaluation statistics included correlation, linear regression, mean difference and percent absolute difference scores, and Clarke error grid analysis. Results: The CGMS values were compared to 2477 SMBG tests (r = 0.91, slope = 0.93, intercept = 14.5 mg/dL, mean absolute difference = 18.0% ± 19.8%). Clarke error grid analysis showed 96.2% of the data pairs falling within the clinically acceptable regions (zones A and B). Conclusions: These results demonstrate the agreement of the CGMS to blood glucose meter values, under conditions of home use, in patients selected by their physicians as candidates for continuous monitoring. The detailed glucose information provided by the CGMS should make successful management of diabetes more easily achieved.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gross et al. (2000) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a20df82dc4e16663149d179https://doi.org/10.1089/152091500316737
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy and Reliability of the Continuous Glucose Monitoring System2000 · 107 citations
  2. 2Renal assessment practices and the effect of nurse case management of health maintenance organization patients with diabetes.1999 · 139 citations
  3. 3Evaluating Clinical Accuracy of Systems for Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose1987 · 1,437 citations
  4. 4Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group.1998 · 8,424 citations
  5. 5STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT1986 · 48,076 citations