Introduction: Clinical cancer screening rates are low among patients who identify as LGBTQ+, especially in rural areas. It is important for rural nurse practitioner (NP) students to be aware of health disparities in cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ and be able to effectively promote cancer screenings in this population. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to determine rural NP students’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of barriers to cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ and to educate NP students on inclusivity related to cancer screenings in this marginalized group. Sample: Nurse practitioner students at a public, rural, liberal arts university Method: Rural NP students participated in an interactive, in-person workshop to which the community was also invited. Didactic information was provided regarding barriers to/awareness of the need for cancer screenings among LGBTQ+ individuals. Students also created educational materials for use in community prevention programming. An anonymized online post-survey assessed NP students’ knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and awareness of cancer screenings among LGBTQ+. Findings: Over 90% of participants (n=62) reported increased knowledge about the healthcare needs of LGBTQ+ populations. The largest mean level of agreement was observed with the statements, “how knowledgeable are you about the healthcare needs of LGBTQ+ populations?” and “how knowledgeable are you about current terms that should be used to increase inclusivity of LGBTQ+ populations in a healthcare setting?”, both resulting in a mean score of 3.52 corresponding with “very knowledgeable”. Three qualitative themes included recognizing the significance of culturally appropriate communication, having increased awareness of recommendations for cancer screening in the LGBTQ+ population, and the importance of reflecting on internal personal biases. Conclusion: Curricular strategies that promote awareness and increase knowledge of LGBTQ+ patient needs are essential to develop a rural NP workforce that can promote health equity and competently care for all patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
George et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: