Mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake is essential for sustaining phasic release and neuromuscular transmission during and following tetanic stimulation in mouse motor nerve terminals.
Mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake sustains neuromuscular transmission in mice; leaves open relevance to human synaptic disorders or therapies.
We investigated how inhibition of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake affects transmitter release from mouse motor terminals during brief trains of action potentials (500 at 50 Hz) in physiological bath [Ca2+]. When mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake was inhibited by depolarizing mitochondria with antimycin A1 or carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenyl-hydrazone, the stimulation-induced increase in cytosolic [Ca2+] was greater (> 10 microM, compared to < or = 1 microM in control solution), the quantal content of the endplate potential (EPP) depressed more rapidly (approximately 84 % depression compared to approximately 8 % in controls), and asynchronous release during the stimulus train reached higher frequencies (peak rates of approximately 6000 s-1 compared to approximately 75 s-1 in controls). These effects of mitochondrial depolarization were not accompanied by a significant change in EPP quantal content or the rate of asynchronous release during 1 Hz stimulation, and were not seen in oligomycin, which blocks mitochondrial ATP synthesis without depolarizing mitochondria. Inhibition of endoplasmic reticular Ca2+ uptake with cyclopiazonic acid also had little effect on stimulation-induced changes in cytosolic [Ca2+] or EPP amplitude. We hypothesize that the high rate of asynchronous release evoked by stimulation during mitochondrial depolarization was produced by the elevation of cytosolic [Ca2+], and contributed to the accelerated depression of phasic release by reducing the availability of releasable vesicles. During mitochondrial depolarization, the post-tetanic potentiation of the EPP observed under control conditions was replaced by a post-tetanic depression with a slow time course of recovery. Thus, mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake is essential for sustaining phasic release, and thus neuromuscular transmission, during and following tetanic stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
David et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: