Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In an interesting paper, Fong (2020) raises objections to my approach to English modals (and modality in general) which he views as too general and not fully compliant with the postulates of Construction Grammar. In this response paper, I intend to explain in some depth the benefits of my approach, as well as the reasons why Construction Grammar, in particular Cognitive Construction Grammar (Goldberg, 1995, 2006, 2019), needs to be interrogated and adapted as a conceptual framework to explain language learning and processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sergio Torres–Martínez (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: