This paper proposes a new strategy, the Multi-Level Decoding (MLD), that allows to use a Very Large Size Dictionary (VLSD, size more than 100,000 words) in speech recognition. MLD proceeds in three steps: <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">•</tex> a Syllable Match procedure uses an acoustic model to build a list of the most probable syllables that match the acoustic signal from a given time frame. <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">•</tex> from this list, a Word Match procedure uses the dictionary to build partial word hypothesis. <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">•</tex> then a Sentence Match procedure uses a probabilistic language model to build partial sentence hypothesis until total sentences are found. An original matching algorithm is proposed for the Syllable Match procedure. This strategy is experimented on a dictation task of French texts. Two different dictionaries are tested, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">•</tex> one composed of the 10,000 most frequent words, <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">•</tex> the other composed of 200,000 words. The recognition results are given and compared. The error rate on words with 10,000 words is 17.3%. If the errors due to the lack of coverage are not counted, the error rate with 10,000 words is reduced to 10.6%. The error rate with 200,000 words is 12.7%.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bernard Mérialdo (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: