Key result
Sinus rhythm restoration post-ablation reduces elevated LAA glucose metabolism by ~34%.
Why the study?
The role of atrial metabolism alterations in the initiation and persistence of AF remains poorly understood.
Does catheter ablation and restoration of sinus rhythm improve altered left atrial glucose metabolism in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=41)
No
Does catheter ablation and restoration of sinus rhythm improve altered left atrial glucose metabolism in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
The role of atrial metabolism alterations for initiation and atrial fibrillation (AF) persistence remains poorly understood. Therefore, we evaluated left atrial glucose metabolism by nicotinic acid derivative stimulated 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in 36 patients with persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation before and 3 months after return to sinus rhythm and compared values against healthy controls. Under identical hemodynamics and metabolic conditions, and although left ventricular FDG uptake remained unchanged, patients in persistent AF presented significantly higher total left atrial and left atrial appendage uptake, which decreased significantly after return to sinus rhythm, despite improvement of passive and active atrial contractile function. These findings support a role of altered glucose metabolism and metabolic wasting underlying the pathophysiology of persistent AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marchandise et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (n=41). Persistent Atrial Fibrillation vs. Sinus rhythm (post-catheter ablation) and healthy controls was evaluated on Left atrial appendage (LAA) FDG standardized uptake value (SUV) mean (p=<0.001). In patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, left atrial appendage glucose metabolism was significantly elevated and decreased significantly upon restoration of sinus rhythm post-ablation (mean SUV 3.2 vs 2.1, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: