Key result
A case study detailed the implementation and organizational impact of the Philips IntelliVue remote physiological monitoring system in a cardiac care center.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to show the impact of implementing a remote physiological monitoring system as a health informatics solution in a cardiac care center.
Case Report
Implementation of a remote physiological monitoring system in a cardiac care center can improve clinical supervision and healthcare provider performance.
May inform remote monitoring deployment in cardiac units; leaves open need for controlled trials to confirm impact.
Remote Patients’ Monitoring System is an essential feature of remote healthcare efficiency and durability. It assures adequate clinical supervision and care to admitted patients in a timely and effortlessly manner. The objective of this case study is to show the impact of a health informatics solution application through the implementation of a remote physiological monitoring system in a cardiac care center. It also discusses the following questions: how health informatics was employed in this case study? how did this case study help healthcare providers to a better performance? how can we decide if we need to implement such a system in other organizations? In addition, an overview of the Philips, IntelliVue Patients’ Monitoring System (PMS) will be demonstrated and justified. The problem statement will be introduced, then, the organizational contextual settings, summary of key facts, problem implications, and the actual solution tailored and achieved by KACC management is verified in an advance detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ftoon Kedwan (2022) conducted a case report in Cardiac conditions. Remote physiological monitoring system (Philips IntelliVue PMS) was evaluated. A case study detailed the implementation and organizational impact of the Philips IntelliVue remote physiological monitoring system in a cardiac care center.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: