Key result
Amiodarone increased the hazard of supratherapeutic INR in patients with normal renal function (HR 1.80; 95% CI 1.23-2.64), but had a negligible effect in those with severe renal dysfunction.
Why the study?
Amiodarone inhibits warfarin metabolism and increases major bleeding risk with substantial interpatient variability, and whether renal dysfunction alters the magnitude of this drug-drug interaction was unknown.
Does renal function alter the magnitude of the warfarin-amiodarone drug-drug interaction in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=9,036)
Does renal function alter the magnitude of the warfarin-amiodarone drug-drug interaction in hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 1.8 (95% CI 1.23–2.64)
Renal function significantly modifies the warfarin-amiodarone drug-drug interaction, with severe renal dysfunction blunting the expected increase in warfarin sensitivity and supratherapeutic INR risk.
May support renal function-stratified INR monitoring with amiodarone-warfarin; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Amiodarone inhibits warfarin metabolism and is associated with major bleeding during warfarin therapy. Managing this drug-drug interaction (DDI) is challenging because of substantial interpatient variability in DDI magnitude. Because renal dysfunction induces changes in drug metabolism and protein binding that could alter cytochrome P450 inhibition mechanisms, we hypothesized that renal dysfunction alters the impact of the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. We tested this question in a propensity-matched cohort study of hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation. Patients were queried from an electronic health record database. Renal function was estimated with creatinine clearance (CrCl). Warfarin response was measured with the warfarin sensitivity index (WSI), a dose-normalized international normalized ratio (INR) measure, and was modeled with multilevel mixed-effects linear regression. Time to supratherapeutic INR (> 4) was modeled using Cox regression. Propensity score matching resulted in 4,518 patients administered amiodarone and 4,518 controls. Amiodarone's effect on warfarin response varied threefold across the renal function range, increasing WSI by 36% in patients with normal renal function (CrCl 115 mL/minute), but by only 11.8% in patients with severe renal dysfunction (CrCl 15 mL/minute). Similarly, amiodarone had a strong effect in patients with normal renal function (hazard ratio (HR) 1.80; 1.23, 2.64), but a negligible effect on supratherapeutic INR hazard in patients with severe renal dysfunction (HR 1.01; 0.75, 1.37). These results suggest that renal function is a novel factor that explains substantial variability in the warfarin-amiodarone DDI. This information could inform warfarin dosage adjustment and monitoring and may have implications for the selection of oral anticoagulation agents in patients treated with amiodarone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miano et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in atrial fibrillation (n=9,036). Amiodarone vs. Controls (no amiodarone) was evaluated on Time to supratherapeutic INR (> 4) in patients with normal renal function (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.23-2.64). Amiodarone increased the hazard of supratherapeutic INR in patients with normal renal function (HR 1.80; 95% CI 1.23-2.64), but had a negligible effect in those with severe renal dysfunction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: