Key result
Implantable loop recorders provided a diagnostic finding in 46.8% of patients presenting with unexplained syncope, palpitations, or ischemic stroke over a mean follow-up of 17.1 months.
Why the study?
Does an implantable loop recorder safely and efficiently identify or exclude serious rhythm disturbances?
Observational (n=62)
No
Does an implantable loop recorder safely and efficiently identify or exclude serious rhythm disturbances?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Implantable loop recorders are safe and effective for identifying or excluding serious rhythm disturbances, guiding targeted therapeutic interventions.
No abstract yet. The journal hasn't published one we can show.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silveira et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Unexplained syncope, palpitations, or cryptogenic stroke (n=62). Implantable Loop Recorder (ILR) was evaluated on Diagnostic yield (identification of symptom cause). Implantable loop recorders provided a diagnostic finding in 46.8% of patients presenting with unexplained syncope, palpitations, or ischemic stroke over a mean follow-up of 17.1 months.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: