Recombinant equine arteritis virus nsp10 exhibits polynucleotide-stimulated ATPase and 5'-to-3' RNA and DNA duplex-unwinding activities, suggesting a close functional relationship with coronavirus helicases.
The biochemical properties of arterivirus nsp10 suggest a close functional relationship with coronavirus helicases, supporting the classification of nidovirus helicases as a distinct group.
The arterivirus equine arteritis virus nonstructural protein 10 (nsp10) has previously been predicted to contain a Zn finger structure linked to a superfamily 1 (SF1) helicase domain. A recombinant form of nsp10, MBP-nsp10, was produced in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with the maltose-binding protein. The protein was partially purified by affinity chromatography and shown to have ATPase activity that was strongly stimulated by poly(dT), poly(U), and poly(dA) but not by poly(G). The protein also had both RNA and DNA duplex-unwinding activities that required the presence of 5' single-stranded regions on the partial-duplex substrates, indicating a 5'-to-3' polarity in the unwinding reaction. Results of this study suggest a close functional relationship between the arterivirus nsp10 and the coronavirus helicase, for which NTPase and duplex-unwinding activities were recently demonstrated. In a number of biochemical properties, both arterivirus and coronavirus SF1 helicases differ significantly from the previously characterized RNA virus SF1 and SF2 enzymes. Thus, the combined data strongly support the idea that nidovirus helicases may represent a separate group of RNA virus-encoded helicases with distinct properties.
Seybert et al. (Sun,) conducted a other in Equine Arteritis Virus (preclinical). Recombinant EAV nsp10 protein vs. MBP-nsp10-KQ mutant was evaluated on ATPase and duplex-unwinding activities. Recombinant equine arteritis virus nsp10 exhibits polynucleotide-stimulated ATPase and 5'-to-3' RNA and DNA duplex-unwinding activities, suggesting a close functional relationship with coronavirus helicases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: