Why the study?
Does endocardial motion or wall thickening better depict the severity of regional contraction abnormality after anterior myocardial infarction?
Population
69 subjects (39 normal subjects and 30 patients at the chronic stage of an anterior myocardial infarction)
Comparison
Assessment of segmental systolic left… vs Assessment of segmental systolic wall thickening…
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Endocardial motion may better depict post-MI contraction abnormalities than wall thickening on cine-MRI; leaves open effects on risk stratification or outcomes.
Does endocardial motion or wall thickening better depict the severity of regional contraction abnormality after anterior myocardial infarction?
Endocardial motion is affected to a greater degree by myocardial infarction than wall thickening, making it a more discriminant index for assessing post-infarction patients using cine-MRI.
Germain et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: