Key result
Citizens rate HRQoL 0.07 points lower than physicians without altering overall surgery rankings.
Why the study?
Decision models for surgical resource allocation incorporate HRQoL values typically determined by citizens, raising the question of whether physician estimates differ and impact model outcomes.
Does the use of citizen-derived HRQoL values compared to physician-derived values significantly alter the ranking of surgical prioritization in decision models?
Cross-Sectional (n=86)
Does the use of citizen-derived HRQoL values compared to physician-derived values significantly alter the ranking of surgical prioritization in decision models?
Physicians assign slightly higher HRQoL values to health states than citizens, but this difference does not meaningfully impact the prioritization ranking of surgeries in decision models.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Physician- and citizen-derived HRQoL values yield equivalent surgical rankings; leaves open preferred source for decision models.
PURPOSE: Decision models can be used to support allocation of scarce surgical resources. These models incorporate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) values that can be determined using physician panels. The predominant opinion is that one should use values obtained from citizens. We investigated whether physicians give different HRQoL values to citizens and evaluate whether such differences impact decision model outcomes. METHODS: A two-round Delphi study was conducted. Citizens estimated HRQoL of pre- and post-operative health states for ten surgeries using a visual analogue scale. These values were compared using Bland-Altman analysis with HRQoL values previously obtained from physicians. Impact on decision model outcomes was evaluated by calculating the correlation between the rankings of surgeries established using the physicians' and the citizens' values. RESULTS: A total of 71 citizens estimated HRQoL. Citizens' values on the VAS scale were - 0.07 points (95% CI - 0.12 to - 0.01) lower than the physicians' values. The correlation between the rankings of surgeries based on citizens' and physicians' values was 0.96 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Physicians put higher values on health states than citizens. However, these differences only result in switches between adjacent entries in the ranking. It would seem that HRQoL values obtained from physicians are adequate to inform decision models during crises.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alphen et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Surgical prioritization (n=86). Citizen HRQoL valuation vs. Physician HRQoL valuation was evaluated on Difference in HRQoL values on the VAS scale (MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.01). Citizens estimated health-related quality of life values on the visual analogue scale to be 0.07 points lower than physicians, but this difference did not substantially alter the ranking of surgeries (rho 0.96, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: