Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper investigates the limits of adaptive voltage scaling (AVS) applied to commercial FPGAs which do not specifically support voltage adaptation. An adaptive power architecture based on a modified design flow is created with in-situ detectors and dynamic reconfiguration of clock management resources. AVS is a power-saving technique that enables a device to regulate its own voltage and frequency based on workload, process and operating conditions in a closed-loop configuration. It results in significant improved energy profiles compared with dynamic voltage frequency scaling (DVFS) in which the device uses a number of pre-calculated valid working points. The results of deploying AVS in FPGAs with in-situ detectors shows power and energy savings exceeding 85 percent compared with nominal voltage operation at the same frequency. The in-situ detector approach compares favorably with critical path replication based on delay lines since it avoids the need of cumbersome and error-prone delay line calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jose Nunez‐Yanez (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: