In harsh environments such as space, strong radiation effects often induce single-event effects that threaten the reliability of computing systems. Meanwhile, edge artificial intelligence (AI) processors deployed in these conditions must not only tolerate faults but also operate under stringent resource constraints, while still ensuring efficient task execution. Achieving high-performance and energy-efficient computation with adaptive reliability in such harsh conditions is therefore of great importance. This work presents Frieren, a fault-tolerant and reconfigurable computing architecture for reliable operation in harsh environments. A 22 nm system-on-chip (SoC) prototype is implemented to validate Frieren and evaluate its resilience to soft errors. Frieren operates in three primary modes: (1) a high-throughput computation engine mode, (2) a multi-core mode featuring adaptive dual-core lockstep (DCLS) for fault tolerance and programmable parallel computing, and (3) a JTAG-assisted scan-chain-based fault injection (FI) mode. The first two modes fully share processing elements and memory resources, ensuring zero data movement during mode transitions, while the third mode supports pre-deployment reliability evaluation by emulating transient faults. Both irradiation and hardware-level FI experiments are conducted to verify reliability, confirming the robustness of Frieren. Radiation tests of the SoC indicate that DCLS can correct up to about 83% of RISC-V errors, while customized parallel computing in multi-core mode achieves a 17.77× latency reduction. Moreover, the SoC delivers up to 17.18 TOPS/W in computation engine mode and 1.92 TOPS/W in multi-core mode, demonstrating an energy-efficient and resilient platform for AI deployment under harsh conditions. In real workloads, the SoC achieves peak energy efficiencies of 14.72 TOPS/W on SuperYOLO and 12.33 TOPS/W on DROID-SLAM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: