Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, Laub et al. [1] and Fernando and Nicholson [2] extended the definition of the cross-Gramian matrix <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wco</tex> to include symmetric MIMO systems where the matrix <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wco</tex> is defined as an integral. In this correspondence, we define this matrix as a solution of a Lyapunov equation and prove the fundamental identity <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wco² = WcWₒ</tex> where <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wc</tex> and <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wₒ</tex> are the controllability and observability Gramians defined via Lyapunov equations. This definition of <tex xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">Wco</tex> complements the integral definition and has some advantages from theoretical and numerical points of view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fernando et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: