Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research on the role of the family in political socialization has often assumed that intergenerational continuity and conflict are opposing models of political development. In a longitudinal design, cross-lagged correlational analysis and path analysis were used to examine the causal relations among parental political ideology, parent-student interpersonal relations, and student political ideology. The results showed both parental ideology and family relations to be important determinants of a student's ideology. Leftist parental ideology and high family conflict each led to leftist student ideology, at least as the family variables were reported by the students. The finding that nonpolitical interpersonal relations were translated into political ideologies may be understood from psychoanalytic, social learning, or historical perspectives. Much of the literature on political socialization derives from either a primarily psychological or a primarily political approach. The psychological approach sees an individual's political beliefs as intimately bound with his personality, his psychological needs and development, and his interpersonal relationships. These issues are central to most aspects of social life, including politics. Researchers and commentators with this orientation stress nonpolitical personality and interpersonal, especially family, relations in explaining the acquisition of individual political ideology
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kraut et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: