In this paper, we assess critically a recent publication that seeks to attribute most developments in the later prehistory of southern Africa to Indian gold-seekers. We show that the book has all the characteristics of 'cult archaeology', resurrecting the prejudices of the nineteenth century and dismissing modern African studies with contempt. 'Indo-Africa' is examined in depth in the belief that it is more profitable to attack than to ignore such publications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hall et al. (1982) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: