In this paper, I evaluate two ways to model the notion of live possibilities: the supervaluation-based approach, and the alternative-based approach. I argue that the alternative-based approach is more promising in fulfilling certain desirable constraints governing live possibilities. However, the existing alternative-based accounts fail to be fully satisfactory. To address this inadequacy, I devise a new alternative-based framework and explore its logical features.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yichi Zhang (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: