Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This papers reports on the design of a new class of acoustic-wave-resonator-(AWR)-based bandpass filters (BPFs). Unlike conventional ladder- and lattice-type AWR architectures, it allows the realization of passbands with constant group delay (T <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">g</inf> ) and larger bandwidth (BW). The devised configuration makes use of N identical hybrid acoustic-wave lumped-element resonators (AWLRs) — each of them contributing to one pole and two transmission zeros (TZs) — and N+1 lumped-element impedance inverters. As an added benefit, it exhibits power transmission response whose maximum realizable BW and T <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">g</inf> flatness does not depend on the electromechanical coupling coefficient (kt 2 ) of its constituent AWRs. For experimental-demonstration purposes, a UHF-band three-pole/six-TZ BPF prototype with in-band linear phase was designed, manufactured, and measured using commercially-available surface-acoustic-wave (SAW) resonators. Its measured characteristics are summarized as: BW of 0.3 MHz, insertion- and return-loss of 2.1 dB and 32 dB, respectively, effective quality factor Qeff of 9,000, and in-band T <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">g</inf> between 1.78 ± 0.02 ps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Psychogiou et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: