Randomized trial evaluates the impact of workshops on digital illustration skills in medical faculty, suggesting significant improvements.
Background Medical illustration enhances comprehension in health sciences, but digital illustration remains underutilized among educators, especially in resource-limited settings. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of hands-on workshops in improving the medical faculty's knowledge and technical skills in digital medical illustration. Methodology Three full-day workshops were conducted across Indian medical colleges with 115 faculty participants. Training focused on the use of Adobe Illustrator software. Participants were evaluated using structured pre- and post-tests (multiple-choice questions and practical items). Feedback was collected using Likert scales and open-ended questions. Quantitative data were analyzed using paired t-tests and effect size (Cohen's d). Qualitative feedback was analyzed using inductive thematic coding with inter-rater agreement (κ = 0.78). Results The mean pre-test score was 4.2 ± 1.3, which increased significantly to 8.5 ± 1.1 post-training (mean difference = 4.3, p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 3.5). Over 90% of participants rated the workshop as "excellent" or "very good." Thematic analysis revealed key outcomes, including improved confidence, the ability to create high-quality visuals, and an increased interest in advanced topics such as 3D modeling. Conclusions The workshop effectively enhanced short-term digital illustration skills and confidence among medical faculty. While long-term outcomes remain unmeasured, such hands-on training holds promise for faculty development in digital pedagogy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhanarkar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: