Key result
In a cost-utility analysis over a 20-year time horizon, icosapent ethyl demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $42,797 per QALY gained compared to placebo in statin-treated Canadian patients.
Why the study?
Despite statin use, many patients with CVD have persistent residual risk, prompting evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of IPE in Canada following the REDUCE-IT trial.
Does icosapent ethyl represent a cost-effective strategy compared to placebo for reducing ischemic cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides in Canada?
Does icosapent ethyl represent a cost-effective strategy compared to placebo for reducing ischemic cardiovascular events in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides in Canada?
Effect estimate: $42,797/QALY gained
Icosapent ethyl appears to be a cost-effective treatment strategy for reducing cardiovascular events in statin-treated Canadian patients with elevated triglycerides at standard willingness-to-pay thresholds.
Supports icosapent ethyl adoption in Canada at standard thresholds; extends efficacy trials with favorable 20-year cost-utility data.
Background: Despite the use of statins, many patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) have persistent residual risk. In a large Phase III trial (REDUCE-IT), icosapent ethyl (IPE) was shown to reduce the first occurrence of the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina. Methods: We conducted a cost-utility analysis comparing IPE to placebo in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides, from a publicly funded, Canadian healthcare payer perspective, using a time-dependent Markov transition model over a 20-year time horizon. We obtained efficacy and safety data from REDUCE-IT, and costs and utilities from provincial formularies and databases, manufacturer sources, and Canadian literature sources. Results: In the probabilistic base-case analysis, IPE was associated with an incremental cost of $12,523 and an estimated 0.29 more quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), corresponding to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $42,797/QALY gained. At a willingness-to-pay of $50,000 and $100,000/QALY gained, there is a probability of 70.4% and 98.8%, respectively, that IPE is a cost-effective strategy over placebo. The deterministic model yielded similar results. In the deterministic sensitivity analyses, the ICER varied between $31,823-$70,427/QALY gained. Scenario analyses revealed that extending the timeframe of the model to a lifetime horizon resulted in an ICER of $32,925/QALY gained. Conclusion: IPE represents an important new treatment for the reduction of ischemic CV events in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides. Based on the clinical trial evidence, we found that IPE could be a cost-effective strategy for treating these patients in Canada.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lachaîne et al. (2023) studied Cardiovascular disease (CVD) or diabetes mellitus (DM) and other CVD risk factors with elevated triglycerides. Icosapent ethyl vs. Placebo was evaluated on Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained ($42,797/QALY gained). In a cost-utility analysis over a 20-year time horizon, icosapent ethyl demonstrated an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $42,797 per QALY gained compared to placebo in statin-treated Canadian patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: