Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Theoretical bounds guide finite-horizon approximations in MDPs; leaves open empirical validation in applied systems.
Error bounds are presented for rolling horizon (RH) policies in general, stationary and nonstationary, (Borel) Markov control problems with both discounted and average reward criteria. In each of these cases, conditions are given under which the reward of the rolling horizon policy converges geometrically to the optimal reward function, uniformly in the initial state, as the length of the rolling horizon increases. A description of the control model and the general assumptions are given. The approach is based on extending the results of J.M. Alden and A.R.L. Smith (1988) on nonstationary processes with finite state and action spaces. However the proofs presented are simpler. This is because, when stationary models are analyzed first, the error bounds follow more or less directly from well-known value iteration results. The corresponding error bounds for nonstationary models are obtained by reducing these models to stationary ones.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">></ETX>
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hernández–Lerma et al. (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: