Key result
Depression screening in hospitalized medical patients is feasible, detecting a median depression prevalence of 33%, with several brief tools showing high sensitivity and specificity.
Why the study?
Are depression screening tools feasible and accurate in hospitalized medical patients, and is depression associated with worse clinical and utilization outcomes?
Systematic Review
Are depression screening tools feasible and accurate in hospitalized medical patients, and is depression associated with worse clinical and utilization outcomes?
Depression is highly prevalent among hospitalized medical patients and is associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher readmission rates, suggesting that inpatient screening using brief tools is feasible and potentially valuable.
Supports inpatient depression screening with brief validated tools; extends evidence on high prevalence and accuracy to hospitalized medical patients.
Depression among hospitalized patients is often unrecognized, undiagnosed, and therefore untreated. Little is known about the feasibility of screening for depression during hospitalization, or whether depression is associated with poorer outcomes, longer hospital stays, and higher readmission rates. We searched PubMed and PsycINFO for published, peer-reviewed articles in English (1990-2016) using search terms designed to capture studies that tested the performance of depression screening tools in inpatient settings and studies that examined associations between depression detected during hospitalization and clinical or utilization outcomes. Two investigators reviewed each full-text article and extracted data. The prevalence of depression ranged from 5% to 60%, with a median of 33%, among hospitalized patients. Several screening tools identified showed high sensitivity and specificity, even when self-administered by patients or when abbreviated versions were administered by individuals without formal training. With regard to outcomes, studies from several individual hospitals found depression to be associated with poorer functional outcomes, worse physical health, and returns to the hospital after discharge. These findings suggest that depression screening may be feasible in the inpatient setting, and that more research is warranted to determine whether screening for and treating depression during hospitalization can improve patient outcomes. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2017;12:118-125.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
IsHak et al. (2017) conducted a systematic review in Depression in hospitalized medical patients. Depression screening vs. Formal psychiatric evaluation or no depression was evaluated on Sensitivity and specificity of depression screening tools and association with clinical outcomes. Depression screening in hospitalized medical patients is feasible, detecting a median depression prevalence of 33%, with several brief tools showing high sensitivity and specificity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: