Key result
Unpartnered status linked to ~31% higher 1-year readmission risk after AMI versus partnered patients.
Why the study?
The impact of marital/partner status on long-term readmission in young AMI survivors, and whether sex differences exist, remained unclear.
Does unpartnered status increase the risk of 1-year all-cause readmission in young adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=2,979)
Yes
Does unpartnered status increase the risk of 1-year all-cause readmission in young adults with acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 1.31 (95% CI 1.15–1.49)
Absolute Event Rate: 34.6% vs 27.2%
Unpartnered status is associated with a higher unadjusted risk of 1-year readmission after AMI in young adults, but this disparity is largely explained by underlying socioeconomic, clinical, and psychosocial factors.
Unpartnered status flags higher readmission risk after young-adult AMI but should not yet change practice; leaves open independent effects after full adjustment for social determinants.
Introduction: Despite evidence supporting the benefits of marriage on cardiovascular health, the impact of marital/partner status on the long-term readmission of young acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors is less clear. We aimed to examine the association between marital/partner status and 1-year all-cause readmission, and explore sex differences, among young AMI survivors. Methods: Data were from the VIRGO study (Variation in Recovery: Role of Gender on Outcomes of Young AMI Patients), which enrolled young adults aged 18-55 years with AMI (2008-2012). The primary end point was all-cause readmission within 1 year of hospital discharge, obtained from medical record, patient interviews, and adjudicated by a physician panel. We performed Cox proportional hazards models with sequential adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and psychosocial factors. Sex-marital/partner status interaction was also tested. Results: Of the 2,979 adults with AMI (2002 women [67.2%]; mean age 48 [interquartile range, 44-52] years), unpartnered individuals were more likely to experience all-cause readmissions compared with married/partnered individuals within the first year after hospital discharge (34.6% versus 27.2%, hazard ratio [HR]=1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.49). The association attenuated but remained significant after adjustment for demographic and socioeconomic factors (adjusted HR, 1.16; 95%CI, 1.01-1.34), and was not significant after further adjusting for clinical factors and psychosocial factors (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95%CI, 0.94-1.28). Sex-marital/partner status interaction was not significant (p=0.69). Sensitivity analysis using data with multiple imputation, and restricting outcomes to cardiac readmission yielded comparable results. Conclusions: In a cohort of young adults aged 18-55 years, unpartnered status was associated with 1.3-fold increased risk of all-cause readmission within 1 year of AMI discharge. Further adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical and psychosocial factors attenuated the association, suggesting that these factors may explain disparities in readmission between married/partnered versus unpartnered young adults. Whereas young women experienced more readmission compared to similar-aged men, the association between marital/partner status and 1-year readmission did not vary by sex.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=2,979). Unpartnered status vs. Married/partnered status was evaluated on All-cause readmission within 1 year of hospital discharge (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.49). Unpartnered status was associated with a 31% increased risk of 1-year all-cause readmission after acute myocardial infarction compared to married or partnered individuals (HR 1.31).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: