Key result
Manual generation of agitated saline produces highly variable microbubbles, indicating low stability and repeatability.
Why the study?
Agitated saline microbubbles are commonly used for right-to-left shunt detection by contrast transcranial Doppler, but generated bubble size is not standardized in clinical practice.
What is the size distribution and variability of agitated saline microbubbles generated by standard manual methods for contrast transcranial Doppler?
What is the size distribution and variability of agitated saline microbubbles generated by standard manual methods for contrast transcranial Doppler?
The standard manual method for generating agitated saline microbubbles produces highly variable bubble sizes, suggesting low stability and repeatability which may affect the reliability of contrast transcranial Doppler for detecting right-to-left shunts.
Manual microbubble variability may limit contrast TCD reliability; leaves open need for standardized generation methods.
Agitated saline microbubbles (MBs) are a common contrast agent for determining right‐to‐left shunt (RLS) by the contrast transcranial Doppler (c‐TCD). The size of the generated bubbles is not standardized in clinical practice. MBs were generated using the recommended manual method by reciprocating motion through two syringes. The bubble size distributions (BSD) were measured using the microscopic shadow imaging technique. The results show that the diameter of MBs is mainly distributed between 10 and 100 μm, the mean bubble size is between 21 and 34 μm, the Sauter mean diameter (D 32 ) is primarily between 50 and 300 μm, and the standard deviation (SD) is between 6 and 17 μm in 80 experiments. It provides a more accurate basis for the recommended manual method instability. The high variance values of the BSD indicate that the manual method has low stability and repeatability. The results of this study can be useful for further improvement of the reliability of c‐TCD in detecting RLS. Research Highlights This study provided the first detailed descriptions of the MBs size distribution in a flowing contrast agent by the microscopic shadow imaging technique. It reveals significant differences in the bubble size of manual foaming during repeated manipulations for each individual and between individuals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pan et al. (2024) studied Right-to-left shunt (RLS). Standard manual method for generating agitated saline microbubbles was evaluated on Bubble size distribution. Manual generation of agitated saline microbubbles produced diameters mainly between 10 and 100 μm with high variance, indicating low stability and repeatability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: