Reveals unique magnetic properties in a novel copper(II) complex, indicating strong coupling effects.
The dinuclear copper(II) complex [Cu2(mu(1,1)-N3)2(im-2py)2(N3)2] [im-2py = 2-(2-pyridyl)-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazolinyl-1-oxy] has been prepared and structurally characterized. The crystal structure consists of a dinuclear unit in which the Cu(II) ions are bridged by two azido ions in a end-on asymmetric fashion and the imino nitroxide radicals are chelating by the two imino N atoms. Accordingly, the magnetic susceptibility data were analyzed considering a linear spin-coupling scheme rad(1)-Cu(2)-Cu(3)-rad(4) (with Si = 1/2, i = 1-4), where the Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian assumes the general form -2Sigma(i)<(j)S(i)S(j). Considering only first-neighbor spin-coupling constants (J13 = J24 = J14 = 0), magnetic susceptibility measurements show that the copper(II) imino nitroxide rad-Cu-(Cu-rad)(rad-Cu)-Cu-rad exchange coupling is ferromagnetic and large (J12 = J34 = J1 > +190 cm(-1)), as is expected for copper imino nitroxide species, and the copper-copper (rad)-Cu-Cu-(rad) coupling through the asymmetric double end-on azide bridges appeared antiferromagnetic and rather large [J23 = J2 = -43(2) cm(-1)]. By contrast, a density functional theory analysis of the system through the computation of broken-symmetry-state energies resulted in J2 approximately 0 cm(-1). This apparent paradox is resolved by introducing a second-neighbor rad-(Cu)-Cu-(rad)(rad)-Cu-(Cu)-rad spin-coupling constant J13 = J24 = J3, which turns out to be antiferromagnetic both experimentally (when J2 is set equal to zero) and computationally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: