Key result
Non-viral gene delivery using gene-activated scaffolds offers a promising strategy for bone and cartilage repair, though success depends on the choice of delivery method, gene, and biomaterial.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Non-viral gene delivery combined with 3D scaffold biomaterials offers a promising approach for in situ transfection and regeneration of bone and cartilage.
Recent advances in the approval and commercialization of gene therapeutics have fostered the return of gene therapy to center stage. But despite new optimism, no Food and Drug Administration approved product exists for the treatment of orthopedic disorders. Non‐viral gene delivery is a promising alternative to recombinant protein administration and viral gene transduction for orthopedic tissue engineering. When applied using appropriately designed systems, it enables temporal control of the overexpression of therapeutic genes, leading to local production of regulatory factors at physiologically relevant levels. Incorporating genetic material into 3D scaffold biomaterials, that is, gene activated scaffolds or hydrogels, presents a particular opportunity to utilize non‐viral gene therapy for in situ transfection of host cells and the regeneration of damaged tissues and organs. But controlled non‐viral gene delivery for musculoskeletal regeneration depends on a multifactorial design in which the choice of gene delivery method, therapeutic gene, and supportive biomaterial play a central role for the success of this strategy. This paper reviews the different modalities of non‐viral gene delivery used for the repair of bone and cartilage, and explores the current challenges and opportunities for the engineering of functional orthopedic tissues using gene activated scaffolds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gonzalez‐Fernandez et al. (2018) conducted a review in Orthopedic disorders. Non-viral gene delivery was evaluated. Non-viral gene delivery using gene-activated scaffolds offers a promising strategy for bone and cartilage repair, though success depends on the choice of delivery method, gene, and biomaterial.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: