Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The delta-corrected Kolmogorov-Smirnov test has been shown to be uniformly more powerful than the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for small to moderate sample sizes. However, the delta-corrected test consists of two tests, leading to a slight inflation of the experimentwise type I error rate. The critical values of the delta-corrected test are adjusted to take into account the two-stage nature of the test, ensuring an experimentwise error rate at the nominal level. A power study confirms that the resulting so-called two-stage delta-corrected test is uniformly more powerful than the classical Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, with power improvements of up to 46 percentage points.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harry J. Khamis (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: