Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
• Drivers neglected vehicles positioned behind and behind side during takeovers. • High oncoming traffic worsened situational awareness of surrounding vehicles. • Situational awareness moderated impacts of surrounding vehicles on safety margins. • Higher situational awareness was not always associated with takeover performance. This study aimed to understand the influence of surrounding vehicle configuration, driving lane, and traffic density on drivers’ situational awareness (SA), takeover performance, and eye-tracking behaviors in conditionally automated driving. An experiment was conducted with the participation of 40 university students using a fixed-base driving simulator configured to simulate SAE Level 3 automation. During the experiment, participants were engaged in playing Tetris on a tablet as a non-driving related task in automated driving mode. Upon hearing an auditory takeover request, participants were instructed to take control of the vehicle, and then complete a scene reconstruction task to report their SA after transferring control back to the automated driving system. Our findings showed that drivers often neglected vehicles at their sides and rear during the takeover, which was associated with higher collision risks. Higher oncoming traffic density led to drivers’ worse SA of surrounding vehicles but more cautious driving behavior. Driving in the right lane generally resulted in smoother takeovers with lower collision risks. Interestingly, while SA did moderate the impacts of driving conditions on safety margins, a higher level of SA did not consistently relate to improved performance, especially in complex scenarios. This suggests the need for support systems that guide drivers to focus on safety–critical objects rather than simply amplifying SA in general. These insights have significant implications for the design of driver monitoring and support systems in automated vehicles.
Jia et al. (Sat,) studied this question.